-
Website
http://startupnorth.ca/ -
Original page
http://www.startupnorth.ca/2008/02/23/velocity-incubator-20-or-something-completely-new/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Jonas
16 comments · 2 points
-
Thusenth
4 comments · 1 points
-
dossip
4 comments · 1 points
-
Chrisarsenault
4 comments · 1 points
-
Bartek
3 comments · 3 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
What is being a startup really about?
1 week ago · 13 comments
-
C’mon Meat, throw me that weak-ass shit!
1 week ago · 7 comments
-
Student Technopreneurship in Alberta
1 week ago · 5 comments
-
Live notes from DemoCamp24 w/ Gary Vaynerchuck
2 weeks ago · 4 comments
-
We have maple syrup and beer
4 weeks ago · 5 comments
-
What is being a startup really about?
RIM will be involved with this, I assume, in some way. It's to close to home for them not to get involved. This could spawn their next competitor or a company they'll buy for future potential. I would apply for this in a heart beat if I went to UW.
My theory is that to effectively commercialize any product or service you need to have the active and engaged participation of private enterprise. Successful commercialization occurs in the private sector, NOT public sector and Universities are essentially public sector organizations. If Velocity has some links (as Duane suggests)to companies in the area that want to commercialize the technology that would be a big plus and improve the probability of success.
The Y-Combinator model is a great one.
With respect to funding issue, this is right at the top of the list for getting notepad to web. Building a start-up takes cash and a healthy ecosystem. Consider that of the 125 LSIF in Canada, Ontario had 67 and this accounted for at least 50% of the funding in the province in 2004. The cancellation of the LSIF program (August 2004) by the Ontario Government took $1.5B out of the early stage funding. This was replaced by essentially two programs IAF ($29M over several years) and IDF ($165M if it actually comes to fruition). So in reality $1.5B was replaced by $29M and $165M at some future date, maybe. When you reduce funding by a ratio of 50:1 there will be problems.
I think in the case of the VeloCity residence, the students have to be self motivated and should not assume that they will get much material outside help. Any of the students who expect or want much help beyond the great atmosphere are in for a rude awakening.
However, my experience with Waterloo students tells me that there will be lots of highly motivated and very excited entrepreneurs at VeloCity who will put in the required work. The key for them is going to learn not to waste time and to just produce product and then test it in the market.
A fear would be that there will be all sorts of "business plan" seminars and sidetracks which will distract from execution focused activity.
It's a great idea, but it's prone to problems. I think the biggest would be determining who gets into this residence -- there needs to be just the right mix of creative/technical/business people to foster a startup environment, but I can see a lot of students applying to get in just for foosball.
With an endorsement from Apple, for a program in RIM's hometown - the students are going to be torn between the two mobile platforms, or just develop for both.
They've yet to announce their corporate partners. Their access to talent and ideas brings up some concerns. Who will ultimately own the products produced?
"Some of the biggest players in mobile communications, web and new media will be partners in VeloCity.
Through their partnership activities, they'll lend their expertise and technology and in return, they'll have access to the talent and ideas developed in the incubator."
i think you are spot on with:
"All you need is for the culture of the place to go off the rails just a little bit and all of a sudden you just have an expensive dorm with a fancy coat of paint. While I am sure that there are a slate of mentors lined up and a full calendar of events, you need people there almost every day to influence the direction of the students."
I look at Waterloo and I see immense opportunity. It's always troubled me somewhat that in all these years, the only real point of pride we keep harking back on from the tricities area is RIM. Is that all Waterloo can churn out in 15 years? For the most part, the brightest and best graduates get swallowed whole by Google, Microsoft, RIM because they know an Engineering/CompSci/Math degree at UW is a free ticket to stability for the life cycle of their careers. Either that or they get into academia or sojourn down south or back to Asia/Europe to complete their masters/doctorate programs and go on to find success elsewhere. They've never deviated from this path because no one has ever fostered that community and everything it entails (mentoring, kinship, experience, hands-on operational approach) while students are still at university.
It's nice to see the University step in and take a shot at it with VeloCity but while the premise is nice, there are a lot of vagaries surrounding the entire implementation and execution with such a project which have already been touched on above. (lack of laser focus, large student body size, ownership/IP issues IP, funding complexity, commercialization support or lack thereof, project imperative drivers, team provisioning/bonding problems etc)
To that end, I think a better model is something which is more akin to what Ian has loosely alluded to in his above comments; bring together a much smaller band of tech savvy entrepreneurial junkies who are not just interested in learning the mechanics and theoretical aspects of starting up, but want to jumpstart building the next Google, Facebook, RIM or Microsoft from their dorm with others just as passionate as they are, coupled with a) the support of mentors who've been there and done that and b) access to early rounds of capital, if need be. Having said that, this latest piece by Jevon is rather serendipitous in that it largely falls on the heels of a project we've been formulating and getting ready to debut (at the fantastic StartupCamp event being organized in Waterloo on February 26th) and push out in the Waterloo area at the start of the September 2008 school term dubbed the 'Hive', a free live-in technology incubator housed in a sweet pad minutes from the UW campus for a select group of a half-dozen or so Waterloo students who want to hit the ground running and work on commercializing the ventures that either they are working on, or that are the product of the close-knit group of students who they would live with throughout the school year during their stay at the Hive.
My view has always been that Waterloo ranks as the top ecosystem in North America (besting Boston/Cambridge, Stanford/Mountain View, San Francisco, Seattle, among others, which have much more active university level student led entrepreneurship) in terms of the latent potential of its student base in commercializing the next generation of world-class web and mobile applications. Someone just needs to create the right culture and light the spark and there's no reason why Waterloo can't be producing the equivalent of a RIM every few years rather than once in a blue-moon.
masini de inchiriat